2012/03/07
2012/03/03
討論逐字稿 Killing Us Softly
Closing statements:
I want to talk about something in the video, I watched it yesterday. In the video, she showed a lot of photoshopped pctures, and people working and reworking the model's bodies, to make them more beautiful. It shocked me really much, we recieve a lot of images, but they're not true! We think that models are born with those beatiful bodies and faces, but actually those models are just like us, normal people. But advertising changes the world to sell products and to sell some kind of image and change our concept, change our life.
I'm surprised that there are different images for different populations, for advertisement, women always have the smaller dogs, and the men always have bigger and strong dogs, like labrador, so the advertisement wants to give us the expectiation, or the idea that women should be more slim, or more soft, or something else, and men must be strong and powerful, and actually, I want to deny the concept, because even if the strengh of women is weaker than men, should we encourage this idea for everyone?
I don't agree that women are weaker than men. We have endurance strength.
And we can handle more than men.
I think we may be fooled by ads for a long time, but I think ads are not always bad, they create needs, it's how we create the economic world, it's how the money circulates, it's how our life gets better. But there comes the problem, is our life really better now? And comfort-wise, yeah, but i don't still don't know the answer.
For advertisement, as i know, it's for selling things and promoting things and persuading people to buy their products, but for these promotion strategies really affect our social value, and it also affects our value, affect the way we evaluate things. I also agree that advertisement treat men and women different, they create an unfair image for the women, but I think like other toxic things in our environment, we should find some ways to live with this kind of toxin. We should have our own opinion to choose what we should be and the way we want to live.
I think advertisement is business, and, it's like, buying things often you don't need, and it's encouraging people to buy things, and new things, and people forget what they really need, and the thing that they already have they actually can reuse. Because recently I'm reading a book about environment, it talks about advertisement and waste.
My question about advertising is, is there another way to do it without reducing people to stereotypes?
I want to talk about something in the video, I watched it yesterday. In the video, she showed a lot of photoshopped pctures, and people working and reworking the model's bodies, to make them more beautiful. It shocked me really much, we recieve a lot of images, but they're not true! We think that models are born with those beatiful bodies and faces, but actually those models are just like us, normal people. But advertising changes the world to sell products and to sell some kind of image and change our concept, change our life.
I'm surprised that there are different images for different populations, for advertisement, women always have the smaller dogs, and the men always have bigger and strong dogs, like labrador, so the advertisement wants to give us the expectiation, or the idea that women should be more slim, or more soft, or something else, and men must be strong and powerful, and actually, I want to deny the concept, because even if the strengh of women is weaker than men, should we encourage this idea for everyone?
I don't agree that women are weaker than men. We have endurance strength.
And we can handle more than men.
I think we may be fooled by ads for a long time, but I think ads are not always bad, they create needs, it's how we create the economic world, it's how the money circulates, it's how our life gets better. But there comes the problem, is our life really better now? And comfort-wise, yeah, but i don't still don't know the answer.
For advertisement, as i know, it's for selling things and promoting things and persuading people to buy their products, but for these promotion strategies really affect our social value, and it also affects our value, affect the way we evaluate things. I also agree that advertisement treat men and women different, they create an unfair image for the women, but I think like other toxic things in our environment, we should find some ways to live with this kind of toxin. We should have our own opinion to choose what we should be and the way we want to live.
I think advertisement is business, and, it's like, buying things often you don't need, and it's encouraging people to buy things, and new things, and people forget what they really need, and the thing that they already have they actually can reuse. Because recently I'm reading a book about environment, it talks about advertisement and waste.
My question about advertising is, is there another way to do it without reducing people to stereotypes?
2012/02/29
3/2 Killing Us Softly
How does advertising work?
Why does advertising work?
In the video Jean Kilbourne says, "The average american sees 3000 ads every day.
And spends 2 years of their life watching commercials."
Do you think that's a lot?
Do you think Taiwanese watch fewer or more ads than Americans?
"Oh, I just don't pay attention to ads. I just tune them out. They have no effect on me."
Agree or disagree?
2012/02/27
課堂筆記 The Danger of a Single Story
What are some of the things that Chimamanda Adichie says about the concept of 'a single story'?
A single story is incomplete.
A single story makes a stereotype about a certain group of people.
I's not enough information.
I guess the danger of a single story is that it leads to bias, so it's dangerous.
Last week we defined 'default' as "something that is set up and recommended for you."
Is there any similarity between the idea of a single story, and the idea of a default?
Well, a single story is set up, but it's not 'recommended'.
Sometimes it is, but it's not part of the definition.
I was thinking about the culture default. Like for instance the other day I read an article about African, and it was like, "Africa, land of darkness", and I was thinking is that like racist code? Because like, Africa is a super bright and hot country, and also has like deserts in it. But every famous novel about africa is like "darkest jungle" and stuff. I feel like any writer (John Locke, Joseph Conrad) can go there and have like two weeks experience touring around and then they think can write a novel and define Africa for the rest of the world. But what I really want to know is, why did John Locke make that stuff up? He's a smart man who wrote lots of smart things about economics. Why the lie?
A single story is incomplete.
A single story makes a stereotype about a certain group of people.
I's not enough information.
I guess the danger of a single story is that it leads to bias, so it's dangerous.
Last week we defined 'default' as "something that is set up and recommended for you."
Is there any similarity between the idea of a single story, and the idea of a default?
Well, a single story is set up, but it's not 'recommended'.
Sometimes it is, but it's not part of the definition.
I was thinking about the culture default. Like for instance the other day I read an article about African, and it was like, "Africa, land of darkness", and I was thinking is that like racist code? Because like, Africa is a super bright and hot country, and also has like deserts in it. But every famous novel about africa is like "darkest jungle" and stuff. I feel like any writer (John Locke, Joseph Conrad) can go there and have like two weeks experience touring around and then they think can write a novel and define Africa for the rest of the world. But what I really want to know is, why did John Locke make that stuff up? He's a smart man who wrote lots of smart things about economics. Why the lie?
2012/02/21
The Danger of a Single Story
What are some of the things that Chimamanda Adichie says about the concept of 'a single story'?
Last week we defined 'default' as "something that is set up and recommended for you."
Is there any similarity between the idea of a single story, and the idea of a default?
2012/02/19
2/17 課堂筆記 The Power of Default
In the TED talk we discussed this week, Dan Ariely is trying to make a point about 'irrational decision making'. But it seems to me that the main connecting idea between his examples is the power that a default choice has upon the decisions we make.
Here are the concluding statements by the people participating in our 2 hour discussion.
I think the world we're living in now is too complicated for me. We're surrounded by ads, commodities, documents… And after today, I feel I cannot trust what people say and the documents I'm going to sign.
[general agreement]
You know, everything is designed.
It's one minute, and make a decision!
Yeah, I think, I never thought that default is so powerful for people, I think, because the choices make us have different feelings about making a choice. so, maybe, that's not about advertisement, or culture or, I don't know how to define it, but I think: Socialization is a kind of default. I'm so impressed by this idea, I never thought I'm in a default, you never feel the default effect.
Here are the concluding statements by the people participating in our 2 hour discussion.
I think the world we're living in now is too complicated for me. We're surrounded by ads, commodities, documents… And after today, I feel I cannot trust what people say and the documents I'm going to sign.
[general agreement]
You know, everything is designed.
It's one minute, and make a decision!
Yeah, I think, I never thought that default is so powerful for people, I think, because the choices make us have different feelings about making a choice. so, maybe, that's not about advertisement, or culture or, I don't know how to define it, but I think: Socialization is a kind of default. I'm so impressed by this idea, I never thought I'm in a default, you never feel the default effect.
2012/02/15
The Power of Default
In this talk, Dan Ariely is trying to make a point about 'irrational decision making'. But it seems to me that the main connecting idea between his examples is the power that a default choice has upon the decisions we make.
2012/02/11
2/10 課堂筆記 The Monkey Economy
Here are the notes to our discussion of the TED Talk Laurie Santos gave on the monkey economy she created to study human economic behaviors.
What are some ways we try to deal with the problem of the temptation to steal(in our real world)?
Teachers and parents tell children that stealing is the worst thing. And if you steal things from others your hand could get cut off.
So, teaching of morals.
Keys! Locking things up.
We don't even think about this, but if nobody stole anything, we wouldn't need to carry keys.
Cameras all over the city. Monitors.
Alarm systems.
Building guard guys. They take packages, sure, but their job is deterrence.
What are some ways we try to deal with the problem of the temptation to steal(in our real world)?
Teachers and parents tell children that stealing is the worst thing. And if you steal things from others your hand could get cut off.
So, teaching of morals.
Keys! Locking things up.
We don't even think about this, but if nobody stole anything, we wouldn't need to carry keys.
Cameras all over the city. Monitors.
Alarm systems.
Building guard guys. They take packages, sure, but their job is deterrence.
2012/02/01
Making Choices in a Monkey Economy
Laurie Santos set up a Monkey Marketplace in a lab to see if, by studying monkey financial behavior, they could find out whether it's possible to change human financial behavior.
2012/01/06
1/6 課堂筆記 The Art of Choosing Part 2
We're discussed the points Sheena Iyengar made in the second half of her talk:
The more choices you have, the more likely you are to make the best choice.
You will surely find the perfect match.
True or false?
False.
Why?
Because it will make me confused, because the choices become more and I must think about more reason to choose the right thing.
This makes me think about the trend for curated websites and stuff like that. Curated means someone has selected it for you according to a set of principles. Like a set of products. So you can go to a kind of shop that you know will have about what you need, and you only have to make a choice of like, three.
But always, I think it's conveneint, but I'm always confused about what should I select for what I need. You hear, this is great, that is great...
Yeah, everything is great!
So what is the best for me?
So you have to know what you want in this situation.
The more choices you have, the more likely you are to make the best choice.
You will surely find the perfect match.
True or false?
False.
Why?
Because it will make me confused, because the choices become more and I must think about more reason to choose the right thing.
This makes me think about the trend for curated websites and stuff like that. Curated means someone has selected it for you according to a set of principles. Like a set of products. So you can go to a kind of shop that you know will have about what you need, and you only have to make a choice of like, three.
But always, I think it's conveneint, but I'm always confused about what should I select for what I need. You hear, this is great, that is great...
Yeah, everything is great!
So what is the best for me?
So you have to know what you want in this situation.
2012/01/02
The Art of Choosing Part 2
Go to The Art of Choosing Part 1
We're going to discuss the second and third points Sheena Iyengar made in her talk:
12/30 課堂筆記 The Art of Choosing
Participants: Maggie, Fannie, Stacy, Angela
We discussed Sheena Iyengar's TED talk, "The Art of Choosing."
"In America, when a paying customer makes a reasonable request based on her preferences, she has every right to have that request met."
In modern taiwan, this is true.
Before they would tell you, there is no sugar, or it's out.
But more and more people ask for higher quality of service, so people feel it's a basic requirement of service to meet reasonable requests.
Why would they tell you tell you there's no sugar?
To save money
"If a choice affects you , then you should be the one to make it."
Do you agree with that?
Why should I make the choice, just because it affects me?
Here's an example. In Taiwan, many parents choose the department that their kids will study. This will affect them.
So, do you agree?
I agree, but in my experience, we're still affected by someone.
I agree with you.
I want to make choices, but sometimes it's in vain.
"This is the ONLY way to ensure that your preferences and interests will be most fully accounted for."
Do you agree with that, that it's the ONLY way?
I found that Europeans or maerican like to say ONLY, but we like to say "maybe".
We discussed Sheena Iyengar's TED talk, "The Art of Choosing."
"In America, when a paying customer makes a reasonable request based on her preferences, she has every right to have that request met."
In modern taiwan, this is true.
Before they would tell you, there is no sugar, or it's out.
But more and more people ask for higher quality of service, so people feel it's a basic requirement of service to meet reasonable requests.
Why would they tell you tell you there's no sugar?
To save money
"If a choice affects you , then you should be the one to make it."
Do you agree with that?
Why should I make the choice, just because it affects me?
Here's an example. In Taiwan, many parents choose the department that their kids will study. This will affect them.
So, do you agree?
I agree, but in my experience, we're still affected by someone.
I agree with you.
I want to make choices, but sometimes it's in vain.
"This is the ONLY way to ensure that your preferences and interests will be most fully accounted for."
Do you agree with that, that it's the ONLY way?
I found that Europeans or maerican like to say ONLY, but we like to say "maybe".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)